OVNI sobre India filmado desde un avión

ovni india

Noviembre de 2015. Grabado desde un avión al sobrevolar Rajasthan, India. Se puede ver un objeto de dimensiones enormes, con forma de secador de pelo, de cuyo mango salen unos puntos luminosos. El vídeo pertenece al canal “SECTION 51”, del Jean Wzgarda, que de reconocer que se trata de una obra gráfica podría ser considerado como un artista de CGIs.

UFO Sighting : UFO over India 👽 (CGI)

whois

——–

11 de enero de 2016

A petición de Wzgarda retiro toda referencia a su página personal y la de su negocio en artes gráficas.

——–

Ya sé que toda esta investigación era innecesaria, ya que es evidente que se trataba de un CGI, al igual que el resto de vídeos de su canal, pero así evitaremos la típica protesta de los trolls que llegan a la página pidiendo pruebas.

Y digo que era evidente por varias razones: porque un objeto de esas dimensiones tenía que haber sido visto en los radares, porque el piloto debería de estar maniobrando para alejarse de él inmediatamente, y porque la gente no pararía de gritar. Pero no ocurrió ninguna de las tres cosas.

En vez de eso, se aprecian los típicos trucos de Adobe After Effects. Acercamiento, blur, los socorridos puntitos luminosos, y el sonido ambiente editado. De hecho el efecto es muy evidente, aunque lo normal es no fijarse en el audio teniendo delante una animación así. Los siguientes segmentos de sonido aparecen en el segundo 30 y 53. Como podéis ver son idénticos.

Segundo 30:

Segundo 53:

Aun así, se trata de un buen trabajo de Jean Wzgarda, pero por favor, que ponga que se trata de un CGI. Es más elegante.

  • @ mescalero:

    :meparto:

  • Digamos que hizo la entrada cuando el partido había terminado. :-D

    Me pareció muy gracioso ese secador de cabellos volador.

  • Hi, I didn’t give you the authorization to publish my photo and my name on your website. Stop publishing false informations here and remove them now. This is defamation and harassing on internet against one person. I took a screen capture of your article attacking me.

  • @ Visitor:

    Stop publishing false informations here and remove them now. This is defamation and harassing on internet against one person. I took a screen capture of your article attacking me.

    Please, tell me which information is false and difamatory and I will delete it. I only gathered public information from internet. If you wish, I can translate the article for you to check it.

  • @ lamentira:

    No le has pedido que al menos se identifique… Hombre es que aveces pareces un crédulo.

  • Visitor dijo:

    Stop publishing false informations here and remove them now.

    Do you mean that the video of reference doesn’t contain any CGI? Don’t make me laugh!

  • Por cierto, el verbo es gather, no gader ;-)

  • @ MaGaO:

    Ojo de lince. :-D

  • @ MaGaO:

    :bueno:

  • Trueno dijo:

    No le has pedido que al menos se identifique… Hombre es que aveces pareces un crédulo.

    No. EL mail que ha opuesto es falso. Pero realmente me da igual que sea Jean o que no. La respuesta es la misma.

  • @ lamentira:
    Do you think that I have time to lose with that ? You’re publishing false informations about my name. I have nothing to do with section5120. I’m the wrong guy. It’s easy today, even for you, to create a website, taking the name of a cgi artist and making that kind of stuff. can you give me the proof that it isn’t you who tricked the data of this domain just to give a name on internet ? Moreover I didn’t give you the right to publish pictures of me and of my personal website on your page, it’s illegal and you know it. Show me a signed authorization from me giving you the right to use these pictures on your website, or maybe you will show me another tricked document… Harassment against a person on internet is illegal too. The screen capture of your page will allow me to defend myself.

  • @ Visitor:
    Whoever you are, you are going to need quite a bit more than Internet threats to get anything going your way. To begin with, you have provided no evidence whatsoever that you are anybody referred to in this blog entry or in any other. Neither have you stated what it is that you want removed
    Thus it is impossible to comply with your demands. And, even if it was, it may just happen that this website’s administrator is unwilling. What will you do then?

  • @ Visitor:

    ¿Quién coño te crees que eres para venir aquí exigiendo algo, tonto del culo?.

    Regard, great Pillock

  • Solo nos faltaba tontos de importación, como si no estuviéramos servidos con los de casa. :enfado:

  • @ Visitor:

    Do you think that I have time to lose with that ?

    As we see that you are still there… Yes, it seems that you have a lot of time to waste.

    I have nothing to do with section5120.

    Well… who.godaddy.com and register.com both give the same result when asked about section51-ufo.com: «Registrant Name: Jean Wzgarda».

    It’s easy today, even for you, to create a website, taking the name of a cgi artist and making that kind of stuff

    Taking into account that this post was published on 28 November, the creation date of the web is 2 of February, the fact that the page has a lot of posts and that is still active («Updated Date: 2016-01-06»)… It seems a lot of work only for this post. Therefore, if you do not have any proof that support your hypothesis, it does not look so strong.

    can you give me the proof that it isn’t you who tricked the data of this domain just to give a name on internet ?

    This is the XXI century, not the French Revolution: a person is innocent until the opposite is proven. However you are asking for proving innocence without giving any prove. Do you have any prove of what you are saying?

  • @ Visitor:

    If you don’t tell us whom you are, I think that our Admin can hardly listen your claims. At least if you believe that the site named «Section 51-ufo.com» is using illegally your name why don’t you make a claim to the Admin of that site instead and stop boring here?

  • @ lamentira:

    Ese tipo @Visitor está «meando fuera del tarro», si niega que el sitio «section51-ufo» pertenezca a él que se la tome con el Admin de ese sitio. Me parece fuera de lugar su queja hacia tí. Bueno, es tan solo mi opinión.

  • @ CarlosR:

    No merece la pena. Pero es triste la indefensión de los bloggers ante estas amenazas.
    En fin. Cualquiera con google, que googlee.

  • @ doc halliday:
    That’s what I’m exactly doing. I’m investigating to make all this stop and find out who is trying to put my name in the dirt. This is not my address and this is not my phone but someone tried to use my name to create this website.

    @lamentira : my name still appears on your page and this is illegal too (see the picture), this is still harassment against me personnally, this is defamation and moreover you do it anonymously here. Who are you, daring to do that ? Do you have the courage to give your name here, just as you put my name on your website publicly in order to put it in the dirt ? I suppose you’re like that kind of hoaxers you pretend you’re hunting. It’s always easier to be 10 anonymous people against one on internet !

  • @ Visitor:
    Nazis were doing the same thing in 1940, just saying…

  • @ Visitor:

    That’s what I’m exactly doing. I’m investigating to make all this stop and find out who is trying to put my name in the dirt. This is not my address and this is not my phone but someone tried to use my name to create this website.

    Then I repeat you what CarlosR said: Why are you complaining here instead of complaining to the administrator of “Section 51-ufo.com”?

  • Visitor dijo:

    my name still appears on your page and this is illegal too (see the picture)

    This is not you, Visitor. This is the other man who has registered that domain. Isn’t it? This information is public and I will not remove it.

  • Visitor dijo:

    @ Visitor:
    Nazis were doing the same thing in 1940, just saying…

    You are making reference to something who seems to be your own words, This is an error in any language. And besides, you are making here the role of Hitler, pretending to prohibite in this place the publication of some data which is public in Internet without any visible copyright rule.